Cambiar a contenido. | Saltar a navegación

Usted está aquí: Inicio / Base de datos de caso / ADHRB vs. Condor Non-Lethal Technologies

ADHRB vs. Condor Non-Lethal Technologies

Descripción del caso

Fecha archivada 22 September 2015
Estado actual Rechazado
Asunto HR violations in Bahrain enabled by tear gas supplier Condor
Resumen del caso The complaint filed by ADHRB against Condor Non-Lethal Technologies focuses on the companys role in violating human rights in Bahrain as a tear gas supplier to the Bahrain government. The complainants argue that Condor violated the OECD Guidelines when the tear gas products sold to Bahrain were subsequently used to violate the human rights of Bahraini citizens. The tear gas canisters manufactured by Condor were specifically linked to the death of a Bahraini citizen after he inhaled tear gas chemicals following an extreme police crackdown on protestors in the village of Bilad al-Qadeem in January 2015.

The complaint specifically relates to the extremely violent response of the Bahrain government to peaceful demonstrators in February 2011. The complaint asserts that as part of its response the Bahrain government uses tear gas in a manner that causes serious bodily injuries and deaths and have hence repurposed tear gas as a weapon to be used against the political opposition rather than as a tool for crowd control.

The complaint alleges that Condor knew or should have known of the Bahrain governments human rights abuses following the use of excessive and disproportionate force on peaceful demonstrators in 2011, but nevertheless allowed its products to directly cause or contribute to the human rights violations in Bahrain without seeking ways to prevent or mitigate the effects of those violations. Moreover, the complaint allege that failed to properly promulgate a human rights policy and failed to carry out appropriate human rights due diligence.
Evolución/Resultado Two months after receipt of the complaint the Brazilian NCP rejected the complaint. The statement of the NCP explained that, while the complaint met the acceptance criteria, the Brazilian Foreign Ministry had refused to release information vital to the continuation of the complaint. As the NCP considered it could not objectively verify the facts, it concludes it is unable to further examine the complaint. As the NCP further assesses that offering its services will not positively contribute to the resolution of the case it decided to reject the complaint.

ADHRB is disappointed about the rejection and calls on the Brazilian government to take action to suspend tear gas exports to Bahrain and hold its companies accountable for violations of business ethics and human rights.
Principes directeurs de l’OCDE relacionados
Palabras claves del caso Los derechos humanos

Información PNC

Nombre PNC National Contact Point Brazil
Dirección PNC Sector da Autarquias Sul Quadra 03 70079 - 900 Brasilia DF, Brazil
Sito web del PNC
Otras PNCs comprometidos



Información de la empresa

Empresa responsable Condor Non-Lethal Technologies
Dirección de la empresa
Sito web de la empresa
Empresa en violación
Pais de operaciones Bahréin
Otras empresas comprometidos

Cronología del desarollo

Fecha Actor Acción Descripción Documento
17 December 2015 ADHRB comunicado de prensa Press release by ADHRB on rejection of the complaint descarga el pdf (54Kb)  
27 November 2015 National Contact Point Brazil desestimar NCP rejects compleint descarga el pdf (76Kb)  
22 September 2015 ADHRB presentar Complaint filed with Brazilian NCP descarga el pdf (560Kb)  

Herramientas Personales

OECD Watch is hosted by