Guideline: Chapter II Paragraph A10

Description Enterprises should carry out risk-based due diligence, for example by incorporating it into their enterprise risk management systems, to identify, prevent and mitigate actual and potential adverse impacts as described in paragraphs 11 and 12, and account for how these impacts are addressed. The nature and extent of due diligence depend on the circumstances of a particular situation.

67 cases relating to 'Chapter II Paragraph A10':

Title Issue Date filed Status
Milieudefensie et al vs. ING ING palm financing contributes to violations 5 July 2019 Filed
KTNC Watch et al vs. Samsung Heavy Industries et al Workers killed and injured in Korean shipyard crane accident 20 March 2019 Filed
IDI, EC, and LICADHO v. Bonsucro Sugar industry MSI fails to address Cambodian land grabs 11 March 2019 Filed
KTNC Watch et al vs KEXIM Violations of FPIC, consultation at Philippine Jalaur dam 15 October 2018 Rejected
Ali Enterprises Factory Fire Affectees Assoc. v. RINA S.p.A. Audit company wrongfully certifying garment factory Pakistan 11 September 2018 Filed
BIRD vs. HPG HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Pending
BIRD vs. Jaguar Land Rover HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Rejected
BIRD vs. Rolex HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Rejected
FIDH, JFI and Redress vs Italtel Adverse impact of Italtel business activities on HR in Iran 13 September 2017 Filed
Fivas et. al vs Bresser Human rights impacts from moving Turkey's Zeynel Bey Tomb 28 July 2017 Concluded
Society for Threatened Peoples vs. Credit Suisse Risks associated with North Dakota Access Pipeline in USA 24 April 2017 Pending
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council vs Seabridge Gold Seabridge Gold's Mining Exploration in Canada 23 December 2016 Rejected
UK Lawyers for Israel vs. PwC PWC audits of Palestinian Authority fail to reveal PA's supp 15 December 2016 Pending
Trade Unions vs. Suzuki Motor Corporation Violations of trade union rights in Thailand 10 May 2016 Concluded
ECCHR et al vs. TÜV Rheinland AG Poor audit of Rana Plaza factory building structure and work 2 May 2016 Concluded
ADHRB vs. SAE Alsetex, Etienne Lacroix Group HR violations in Bahrain enabled by tear gas supplier Condor 19 August 2015 Agreement
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs J-Power HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia 29 July 2015 Pending
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs ITOCHU HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia 29 July 2015 Pending
Takkom Jerry & LSD vs. Nykomb Synergetics Development AB Severe impacts of Nykomb’s planned coal-fired power plant 29 April 2015 Pending
Bart Stapert vs. Mylan Mylan’s export of drugs used for death penalty in the US 3 March 2015 Agreement
PWT Group's role in the Rana Plaza collapse PWT Group's role in Rana Plaza building collapse 12 December 2014 Concluded
KTNCW et all. vs. NBIM Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
KTNCW et all. vs. NPS Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
KTNCW et all. vs. POSCO Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
KTNCW et all. vs. Daewoo Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
EC and IDI vs. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group ANZ’s role in displacing & dispossessing Cambodian families 6 October 2014 Concluded
Human Rights Law Centre and Raid vs G4S G4S’s contribution to human rights abuses of asylum seekers 23 September 2014 Rejected
Fivas vs. Norconsult Norconsult’s lack of due diligence in Malaysia 22 August 2014 Agreement
Several Individuals vs. NORDEX SE operating in Turkey Wind energy project in Turkey 4 August 2014 Concluded
Friends of the Earth vs. Rabobank Controversial Rabobank investment in palm oil in Indonesia 26 June 2014 Agreement

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by