Guideline: Chapter II Paragraph A11

Description Enterprises should avoid causing or contributing to adverse impacts on matters covered by the Guidelines, through their own activities, and address such impacts when they occur.

64 cases relating to 'Chapter II Paragraph A11':

Title Issue Date filed Status
Milieudefensie et al vs. ING ING palm financing contributes to violations 5 July 2019 Filed
KTNC Watch et al vs KEXIM Violations of FPIC, consultation at Philippine Jalaur dam 15 October 2018 Rejected
Ali Enterprises Factory Fire Affectees Assoc. v. RINA S.p.A. Audit company wrongfully certifying garment factory Pakistan 11 September 2018 Filed
BIRD vs. HPG HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Pending
BIRD vs. Jaguar Land Rover HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Rejected
BIRD vs. Rolex HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Rejected
FIDH, JFI and Redress vs Italtel Adverse impact of Italtel business activities on HR in Iran 13 September 2017 Filed
Fivas et. al vs Bresser Human rights impacts from moving Turkey's Zeynel Bey Tomb 28 July 2017 Concluded
UK Lawyers for Israel vs. PwC PWC audits of Palestinian Authority fail to reveal PA's supp 15 December 2016 Pending
Jamaa Resource Initiatives et. al vs US Company Labor and health harms by US Subsidiary at Yala Swamp Kenya 18 October 2016 Concluded
Trade Unions vs. Suzuki Motor Corporation Violations of trade union rights in Thailand 10 May 2016 Concluded
ECCHR et al vs. TÜV Rheinland AG Poor audit of Rana Plaza factory building structure and work 2 May 2016 Concluded
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs ITOCHU HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia 29 July 2015 Pending
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs J-Power HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia 29 July 2015 Pending
Forum Suape et al. vs. Complexo Industrial e Portuário Eral Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil 1 June 2015 Rejected
Forum Suape et al. vs. Van Oord Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil 1 June 2015 Pending
Forum Suape et al. vs. Atradius Dutch State Business Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil 1 June 2015 Concluded
Takkom Jerry & LSD vs. Nykomb Synergetics Development AB Severe impacts of Nykomb’s planned coal-fired power plant 29 April 2015 Pending
Bart Stapert vs. Mylan Mylan’s export of drugs used for death penalty in the US 3 March 2015 Agreement
KTNCW et all. vs. NBIM Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
KTNCW et all. vs. NPS Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
KTNCW et all. vs. POSCO Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
KTNCW et all. vs. Daewoo Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
EC and IDI vs. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group ANZ’s role in displacing & dispossessing Cambodian families 6 October 2014 Concluded
Human Rights Law Centre and Raid vs G4S G4S’s contribution to human rights abuses of asylum seekers 23 September 2014 Rejected
Fivas vs. Norconsult Norconsult’s lack of due diligence in Malaysia 22 August 2014 Agreement
WeCAN vs. Arrow International Damaged homes after 2010 and 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 17 June 2014 Pending
ADHRB vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. Complicity Formula One race in HR violations in Bahrain 31 May 2014 Agreement
ADHRB vs. Formula One Management Ltd. Complicity Formula One race in HR violations in Bahrain 31 May 2014 Agreement
ADHRB vs. Beta D3 Ltd. Complicity Formula One race in HR violations in Bahrain 31 May 2014 Rejected

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by