Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home / Case database / Colombian communities vs. Xstrata

Guideline: Version 2000 Chapter II Paragraph II.2

Description Enterprises should respect the human rights of those affected by their activities consistent with the host government’s international obligations and commitments.

75 cases relating to 'Version 2000 Chapter II Paragraph II.2':

Title Issue Date filed Status
RAID vs. Avient UK companies & illegal resource exploitation in DRC 28 June 2004 Concluded
RAID vs. Das Air UK companies & illegal resource exploitation in DRC 28 June 2004 Concluded
RAID vs. Oryx UK companies & illegal resource exploitation in DRC 28 June 2004 Concluded
Proyecto Gato vs. Tractebel Tractebel’s Houay Ho dam in Laos 15 April 2004 Concluded
Protest Toyota Campaign vs. Toyota Toyota's anti-trade union practices in the Philippines 4 March 2004 Blocked
CGB Network vs H.C. Starck H.C.Starck buying coltan from DRC supporting the conflict 2 October 2003 Rejected
NiZA et al. vs. CPH CPH & illegal resource exploitation in DRC 3 July 2003 Rejected
Greenpeace Germany vs. West LB West LB financing of oil pipeline in Ecuador 15 May 2003 Rejected
ATTAC & FoE Sweden vs. Sandvik Gold mining, pollution, rights violations in Ghana 18 February 2003 Concluded
ATTAC & FoE Sweden vs. Atlas Copco Gold mining, pollution, rights violations in Ghana 18 February 2003 Concluded
Germanwatch vs. Continental AG Continental AG's labour practices in Mexico 27 May 2002 Concluded
Greenpeace vs. TotalFinaElf TotalFinaElf’s oil supply from Russia 10 April 2002 Rejected
RAID vs. Anglo American Anglo American mining activities in Zambia 27 February 2002 Closed
Oxfam Canada vs. First Quantum Mining First Quantum and forced evictions in Zambia 16 July 2001 Agreement
RAID vs. Binani Binani's corruption in mining industry Zambia 1 May 2001 Withdrawn

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by