Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home / Case database / MiningWatch Canada et al vs. Barrick Gold Corporation

Guideline: Version 2000 Chapter II Paragraph II.11

Description Enterprises should abstain from any improper involvement in local political activities.

13 cases relating to 'Version 2000 Chapter II Paragraph II.11':

Title Issue Date filed Status
Former employees vs. Heineken Unlawful dismissals by Heineken’s subsidiary in eastern DRC 14 December 2015 Agreement
Ireland-Palestine Solidarty Campaign vs. CRH CRH's involvement in construction activities in the OPT 3 May 2011 Blocked
MiningWatch Canada et al vs. Barrick Gold Corporation Human rights violations at Barrick’s Porgera JV Mine in PNG 1 March 2011 Agreement
Friends of the Earth vs. Arcelor Mittal Mismanagement of community fund by ArcelorMittal Liberia 24 January 2011 Agreement
Greenpeace Germany vs Vattenfall Environment and disclosure issues at Vattenfall in Germany 29 October 2009 Rejected
Germanwatch vs. Volkswagen Volkswagen’s climate change impacts 7 May 2007 Rejected
Global Witness vs. Afrimex Afrimex’s mineral trading in the DRC 20 February 2007 Concluded
Fenceline Community and FoE NL vs. Royal Dutch Shell Shell’s Pandacan oil depot in the Philippines 15 May 2006 Concluded
11.11.11 et al vs. George Forrest International SA Belgian companies illegal resource exploitation in DRC 24 November 2004 Concluded
RAID vs. Oryx UK companies & illegal resource exploitation in DRC 28 June 2004 Concluded
RAID vs. Ridgepoint UK companies & illegal resource exploitation in DRC 28 June 2004 Withdrawn
RAID vs. Tremalt UK companies & illegal resource exploitation in DRC 28 June 2004 Withdrawn
NiZA et al. vs. CPH CPH & illegal resource exploitation in DRC 3 July 2003 Rejected

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by