Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home / Case database / Siemenpuu et al vs Pöyry Group

Guideline: Chapter II Paragraph A12

Description Enterprises should seek to prevent or mitigate an adverse impact where they have not contributed to that impact, when the impact is nevertheless directly linked to their operations, products or services by a business relationship. This is not intended to shift responsibility from the entity causing an adverse impact to the enterprise with which it has a business relationship.

68 cases relating to 'Chapter II Paragraph A12':

Title Issue Date filed Status
CLEC & ERI vs Fanjul Corporation Illegal eviction of villagers by ASR in Cambodia 31 October 2012 Concluded
SEW and Stroitel vs. Barclays Shell & 3 UK banks link with violations Sakhalin II complex 31 July 2012 Rejected
SEW and Stroitel vs. Royal Bank of Scotland Shell & 3 UK banks link with violations Sakhalin II complex 31 July 2012 Rejected
SEW and Stroitel vs. Standard Chartered Bank Shell & 3 UK banks link with violations Sakhalin II complex 31 July 2012 Rejected
SEW and Stroitel vs. Shell Shell & 3 UK banks link with violations Sakhalin II complex 31 July 2012 Rejected
CCFD et. al. vs MICHELIN Multiple violations in construction MICHELIN plant in India 10 July 2012 Withdrawn
Siemenpuu et al vs Pöyry Group Pöyry Group's controversial advice on Xayaburi Dam in Laos 11 June 2012 Concluded
ACIDH et al vs Compagnie Minière de Sud Katanga Human rights violations at CMSK mine in the DRC 4 April 2012 Concluded

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by