Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home / Case database / Finance & Trade Watch Austria et al vs Andritz AG

Guideline: Chapter VI Paragraph 3

Description Assess, and address in decision-making, the foreseeable environmental, health, and safety-related impacts associated with the processes, goods and services of the enterprise over their full life cycle with a view to avoiding or, when unavoidable, mitigating them. Where these proposed activities may have significant environmental, health, or safety impacts, and where they are subject to a decision of a competent authority, prepare an appropriate environmental impact assessment.

20 cases relating to 'Chapter VI Paragraph 3':

Title Issue Date filed Status
Human Rights Law Centre vs. Rio Tinto Rio Tinto former mine pollution impacts indigenous PNG commu 29 September 2020 Pending
RAID et al. vs. Glencore UK Providing products and services to Isreali prison system 10 September 2020 Filed
IDI & FIAN Germany vs. HeidelbergCement HeidelbergCement mine & factory threaten Indigenous Samin 9 September 2020 Filed
Indigenous women and Divest Invest Protect vs. Credit Suisse Credit Suisse contribution to harms at DAPL 30 January 2020 Filed
Aminigboko Community of Abua/Odual L.G.A. vs. SPDC/Shell Shell's violation of guidelines in Aminigboko Community 16 May 2019 Filed
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs ITOCHU HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia 29 July 2015 Pending
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs J-Power HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia 29 July 2015 Pending
Forum Suape et al. vs. Atradius Dutch State Business Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil 1 June 2015 Concluded
Forum Suape et al. vs. Complexo Industrial e Portuário Eral Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil 1 June 2015 Rejected
Forum Suape et al. vs. Van Oord Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil 1 June 2015 Pending
Several Individuals vs. NORDEX SE operating in Turkey Wind energy project in Turkey 4 August 2014 Concluded
Danish NGO vs. Danish Company Pollution and selling hazardous products by Danish company 30 April 2014 Rejected
Finance & Trade Watch Austria et al vs Andritz AG Andritz’ contribution to severe impacts of dam in Laos 9 April 2014 Agreement
Paracuta vs. Kinross Gold Corporation 1 Human rights violations of Kinross Gold Corp. in Brazil 18 June 2013 Agreement
Lok Shakti Abhiyan et.al vs Government Pension Fund - Global POSCO’s involvement in HR and environmental impact in India 9 October 2012 Concluded
Lok Shakti Abhiyan et al. vs POSCO POSCO’s involvement in HR and environmental impact in India 9 October 2012 Rejected
A resident from Hungary vs. MNE number two Environmental issues in the Netherlands, the UK and the USA 23 August 2011 Rejected
A resident from Hungary vs. MNE number one Environmental issues in the Netherlands, the UK and the USA 23 August 2011 Rejected
A resident from Hungary vs. MNE number four Environmental issues in the Netherlands, the UK and the USA 23 August 2011 Rejected
A resident from Hungary vs. MNE number three Environmental issues in the Netherlands, the UK and the USA 23 August 2011 Rejected

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by