Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home / Case database / Forum Suape et al. vs. Van Oord

Guideline: Chapter II Paragraph A2

Description Enterprises should respect the internationally recognised human rights of those affected by their activities.

55 cases relating to 'Chapter II Paragraph A2':

Title Issue Date filed Status
BIRD vs. HPG HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Pending
BIRD vs. Jaguar Land Rover HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Rejected
BIRD vs. Rolex HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Rejected
Alianza por la Solidaridad v. Grupo ACS-COBRA Environmental, FPIC abuses impact Q'eqchi indigenous 16 November 2017 Pending
Fivas et. al vs Bresser Human rights impacts from moving Turkey's Zeynel Bey Tomb 28 July 2017 Concluded
Trade Unions vs. Suzuki Motor Corporation Violations of trade union rights in Thailand 10 May 2016 Concluded
Forum Suape et al. vs. Complexo Industrial e Portuário Eral Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil 1 June 2015 Rejected
Forum Suape et al. vs. Atradius Dutch State Business Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil 1 June 2015 Concluded
Forum Suape et al. vs. Van Oord Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil 1 June 2015 Pending
ELSAM et all. vs. Holcim Indonesia Holcim’s complicity in HR abuses and conflict in Indonesia 19 March 2015 Concluded
Bart Stapert vs. Mylan Mylan’s export of drugs used for death penalty in the US 3 March 2015 Agreement
KTNCW et all. vs. NBIM Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
KTNCW et all. vs. NPS Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
KTNCW et all. vs. POSCO Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
KTNCW et all. vs. Daewoo Daewoo’s use of cotton harvested with forced & child labour 3 December 2014 Rejected
EC and IDI vs. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group ANZ’s role in displacing & dispossessing Cambodian families 6 October 2014 Concluded
Human Rights Law Centre and Raid vs G4S G4S’s contribution to human rights abuses of asylum seekers 23 September 2014 Rejected
Fivas vs. Norconsult Norconsult’s lack of due diligence in Malaysia 22 August 2014 Agreement
Reprieve vs. British Telecommunications plc Facilitating US drone strikes in Yemen by BT Group 19 August 2014 Rejected
WeCAN vs. Arrow International Damaged homes after 2010 and 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 17 June 2014 Pending
Finance & Trade Watch Austria et al vs Andritz AG Andritz’ contribution to severe impacts of dam in Laos 9 April 2014 Agreement
Canada Tibet Committee vs. China Gold Int. Resources Environmental, HR & disclosure issues China Gold Int. 29 January 2014 Concluded
WeCAN vs. Vero Insurance New Zealand Limited Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Filed
WeCAN vs. IAG New Zealand Limited Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Pending
WeCAN vs. Tower Insurance Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Filed
WeCAN vs. Southern Response Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Rejected
WeCAN vs. Fletcher Construction Company Limited Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Pending
WeCAN vs. Earthquake Commission (EQC) Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Rejected
Privacy International vs Interoute HR violations facilitated by 6 UK telecom companies 5 November 2013 Rejected
Privacy International vs Level 3 HR violations facilitated by 6 UK telecom companies 5 November 2013 Rejected

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by