Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home / Case database / Individual complainant vs. Danish subsidiary in Israel

Guideline: Chapter IV Paragraph 5

Description Enterprises should, within the framework of internationally recognised human rights, the international human rights obligations of the countries in which they operate as well as relevant domestic laws and regulations:

Carry out human rights due diligence as appropriate to their size, the nature and context of operations and the severity of the risks of adverse human rights impacts.

93 cases relating to 'Chapter IV Paragraph 5':

Title Issue Date filed Status
Human Rights Law Centre vs. Rio Tinto Rio Tinto former mine pollution impacts indigenous PNG commu 29 September 2020 Pending
Public Eye et al. vs. Syngenta Syngenta pesticide poisons Indian agricultural workers 17 September 2020 Filed
IDI & FIAN Germany vs. HeidelbergCement HeidelbergCement mine & factory threaten Indigenous Samin 9 September 2020 Filed
Indigenous women and Divest Invest Protect vs. Credit Suisse Credit Suisse contribution to harms at DAPL 30 January 2020 Filed
Society for Threatened Peoples vs. BKW Energie AG BKW Energie AG's wind production on Sami territory Norway 16 January 2020 Pending
KTNC Watch et al vs. KEXIM POSCO's violations in palm plantation in Papua 12 December 2019 Rejected
KTNC Watch et al vs. National Pension Service POSCO's violations in palm plantation in Papua 12 December 2019 Pending
KTNC Watch et al vs. POSCO POSCO's violations in palm plantation in Papua 12 December 2019 Pending
Lawyers for Palestinian Human Rights vs. J.C. Bamford Ltd JCB's machinery used in West Bank demolition and settlements 10 December 2019 Pending
Milieudefensie et al vs. ING ING palm financing contributes to violations 5 July 2019 Pending
South Korean Civil Society Task Force vs. SK E&C Dam collapse in Laos involving Kexim 17 June 2019 Pending
South Korean Civil Society Task Force Team vs. KEXIM Dam collapse in Laos involving Kexim 17 June 2019 Rejected
South Korean Civil Society Team v. Korean Western Power Dam collapse in Laos involving Kexim 17 June 2019 Pending
IDI, EC, and LICADHO v. Bonsucro Sugar industry MSI fails to address Cambodian land grabs 11 March 2019 Pending
Former employee vs. Banro Corporation Banro’s non-observance of Guidelines at the Twangiza Mine 24 December 2018 Rejected
KTNC Watch et al vs KEXIM Violations of FPIC, consultation at Philippine Jalaur dam 15 October 2018 Rejected
KTNC Watch et al vs Daewoo Violations of FPIC, consultation at Philippine Jalaur dam 15 October 2018 Rejected
Development YES – Open-Pit Mines NO vs. Group PZU S.A. PZU activites in financial sector in Warsaw 6 August 2018 Agreement
ASF and I Watch vs. Perenco Perenco's extractive activities in Kebili, Tunisia 26 July 2018 Pending
BIRD vs. HPG HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Pending
BIRD vs. Jaguar Land Rover HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Rejected
BIRD vs. Rolex HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Rejected
TuK Indonesia vs. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) RSPO's violation of Indonesian indigenous peoples rights 23 January 2018 Agreement
FIDH, JFI and Redress vs Italtel Adverse impact of Italtel business activities on HR in Iran 13 September 2017 Rejected
Society for Threatened Peoples vs. Credit Suisse Risks associated with North Dakota Access Pipeline in USA 24 April 2017 Agreement
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council vs Seabridge Gold Seabridge Gold's Mining Exploration in Canada 23 December 2016 Rejected
UK Lawyers for Israel vs. PwC PWC audits of Palestinian Authority fail to reveal PA's supp 15 December 2016 Concluded
Australian Women Without Borders vs. Mercer PR Privacy violation of sexual assault victim 27 October 2016 Concluded
ECDHR et al vs Boeing & Lockheed Martin Boeing & Lockheed Martin's products in Yemen 23 June 2016 Rejected
NGOs vs UK Defence Equipment Company Human impacts impacts by munitions supplied to Saudi Arabi 6 June 2016 Rejected

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by