Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home / Case database / Fivas et. al vs Bresser

Guideline: Chapter II Paragraph A14

Description Enterprises should engage with relevant stakeholders in order to provide meaningful opportunities for their views to be taken into account in relation to planning and decision making for projects or other activities that may significantly impact local communities.

27 cases relating to 'Chapter II Paragraph A14':

Title Issue Date filed Status
Hou Friesland mooi vs NUON Community concerns with construction of wind park by NUON 14 December 2017 Agreement
Fivas et. al vs Bresser Human rights impacts from moving Turkey's Zeynel Bey Tomb 28 July 2017 Concluded
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council vs Seabridge Gold Seabridge Gold's Mining Exploration in Canada 23 December 2016 Rejected
Jamaa Resource Initiatives et. al vs US Company Labor and health harms by US Subsidiary at Yala Swamp Kenya 18 October 2016 Concluded
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs J-Power HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia 29 July 2015 Pending
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs ITOCHU HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia 29 July 2015 Pending
Takkom Jerry & LSD vs. Nykomb Synergetics Development AB Severe impacts of Nykomb’s planned coal-fired power plant 29 April 2015 Pending
ELSAM et all. vs. Holcim Indonesia Holcim’s complicity in HR abuses and conflict in Indonesia 19 March 2015 Concluded
Canada Tibet Committee vs. China Gold Int. Resources Environmental, HR & disclosure issues China Gold Int. 29 January 2014 Concluded
WeCAN vs. Vero Insurance New Zealand Limited Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Filed
WeCAN vs. IAG New Zealand Limited Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Pending
WeCAN vs. Tower Insurance Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Filed
WeCAN vs. Fletcher Construction Company Limited Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Pending
WeCAN vs. Southern Response Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Rejected
WeCAN vs. Earthquake Commission (EQC) Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Rejected
WWF vs SOCO Oil exploration by SOCO in Virunga National Park DRC 7 October 2013 Agreement
FIDH et al vs. CRCC-Tongguan Investment (Canada) Co., Ltd. HR abuses at Mirador mining project in the Ecuadorian Amazon 25 July 2013 Rejected
Crude Accountability et al. vs. British Gas Environmental, health & HR violations by KPO in Kazakhstan 6 June 2013 Concluded
Crude Accountability et al. vs. ENI Environmental, health & HR violations by KPO in Kazakhstan 6 June 2013 Concluded
Crude Accountability et al. vs. Chevron Environmental, health & HR violations by KPO in Kazakhstan 6 June 2013 Concluded
Uwe Kekeritz et al vs. KiK German company's responsibility for Bangladesh factory fire 13 May 2013 Concluded
Amadiba Crisis Committee vs. MRC Ltd. Human rights violations by mining agents. Amadiba, S. Africa 1 February 2013 Rejected
Jijnjevaerie Saami village vs Statkraft Statkraft's wind power plans breach Saami rights in Sweden 29 October 2012 Concluded
Lok Shakti Abhiyan et.al vs Government Pension Fund - Global POSCO’s involvement in HR and environmental impact in India 9 October 2012 Concluded
Lok Shakti Abhiyan et. al. vs ABP POSCO’s involvement in HR and environmental impact in India 9 October 2012 Agreement
Lok Shakti Abhiyan et al. vs POSCO POSCO’s involvement in HR and environmental impact in India 9 October 2012 Rejected
CCFD et. al. vs MICHELIN Multiple violations in construction MICHELIN plant in India 10 July 2012 Withdrawn

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by