Guideline: Version 2000 Chapter IV Paragraph IV.1 Subparagraph IV.1.B
| Description | Enterprises should contribute to the effective abolition of child labour. |
|---|
13 cases relating to 'Version 2000 Chapter IV Paragraph IV.1 Subparagraph IV.1.B':
| Title | Issue | Date filed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ECCHR, Sherpa & UGF vs Louis Dreyfus | Child labour in the Uzbek cotton trade | 23 December 2010 | Agreement |
| ECCHR, Sherpa & UGF vs ICT Cotton | Child labour in the Uzbek cotton trade | 12 December 2010 | Agreement |
| ECCHR, Sherpa & UGF vs Cargill Cotton | Child labour in the Uzbek cotton trade | 12 December 2010 | Agreement |
| ECCHR, Sherpa & UGF vs Devcot S.A. | Child labour in the Uzbek cotton trade | 25 October 2010 | Concluded |
| ECCHR, Sherpa and UGF vs Otto Stadtlander | Child labour in the Uzbek cotton trade | 25 October 2010 | Agreement |
| ECCHR, Sherpa & UGF vs ECOM Agroindus-trial Corp Ltd. | Child labour in the Uzbek cotton trade | 25 October 2010 | Agreement |
| ECCHR, Sherpa & UGF vs Paul Reinhart AG | Child labour in the Uzbek cotton trade | 25 October 2010 | Agreement |
| Global Witness vs. Afrimex | Afrimex’s mineral trading in the DRC | 20 February 2007 | Concluded |
| 11.11.11 et al vs. Cogecom | Belgian companies illegal resource exploitation in DRC | 24 November 2004 | Rejected |
| Germanwatch vs. Bayer | Bayer's cotton seed production in India | 11 October 2004 | Concluded |
| NiZA et al. vs. CPH | CPH & illegal resource exploitation in DRC | 3 July 2003 | Rejected |
| ICN vs. Kubbinga | Labour violations in Indian football production | 20 June 2001 | Rejected |
| ICN vs. Adidas Netherlands | Labour violations in Indian football production | 20 June 2001 | Concluded |
