Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home / Case database / ECCHR et al vs. TÜV Rheinland AG

Guideline: Chapter IV Paragraph 2

Description Enterprises should, within the framework of internationally recognised human rights, the international human rights obligations of the countries in which they operate as well as
relevant domestic laws and regulations:

Within the context of their own activities, avoid causing or contributing to adverse human rights impacts and address such impacts when they occur.

87 cases relating to 'Chapter IV Paragraph 2':

Title Issue Date filed Status
Milieudefensie et al vs. ING ING palm financing contributes to violations 5 July 2019 Filed
South Korean Civil Society Task Force vs. SK E&C Dam collapse in Laos involving Kexim 17 June 2019 Pending
South Korean Civil Society Task Force Team vs. KEXIM Dam collapse in Laos involving Kexim 17 June 2019 Rejected
South Korean Civil Society Team v. Korean Western Power Dam collapse in Laos involving Kexim 17 June 2019 Pending
Aminigboko Community of Abua/Odual L.G.A. vs. SPDC/Shell Shell's violation of guidelines in Aminigboko Community 16 May 2019 Filed
Former employee vs. Banro Corporation Banro’s non-observance of Guidelines at the Twangiza Mine 24 December 2018 Rejected
KTNC Watch et al vs KEXIM Violations of FPIC, consultation at Philippine Jalaur dam 15 October 2018 Rejected
KTNC Watch et al vs Daewoo Violations of FPIC, consultation at Philippine Jalaur dam 15 October 2018 Rejected
Ali Enterprises Factory Fire Affectees Assoc. v. RINA S.p.A. Audit company wrongfully certifying garment factory Pakistan 11 September 2018 Filed
Development YES – Open-Pit Mines NO vs. Group PZU S.A. 6 August 2018 Agreement
BIRD vs. HPG HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Pending
BIRD vs. Jaguar Land Rover HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Rejected
BIRD vs. Rolex HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain 11 April 2018 Rejected
FIDH, JFI and Redress vs Italtel Adverse impact of Italtel business activities on HR in Iran 13 September 2017 Rejected
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council vs Seabridge Gold Seabridge Gold's Mining Exploration in Canada 23 December 2016 Rejected
UK Lawyers for Israel vs. PwC PWC audits of Palestinian Authority fail to reveal PA's supp 15 December 2016 Pending
Australian Women Without Borders vs. Mercer PR Privacy violation of sexual assault victim 27 October 2016 Concluded
Jamaa Resource Initiatives et. al vs US Company Labor and health harms by US Subsidiary at Yala Swamp Kenya 18 October 2016 Concluded
ECDHR et al vs Boeing & Lockheed Martin Boeing & Lockheed Martin's products in Yemen 23 June 2016 Rejected
NGOs vs UK Defence Equipment Company Human impacts impacts by munitions supplied to Saudi Arabi 6 June 2016 Rejected
Trade Unions vs. Suzuki Motor Corporation Violations of trade union rights in Thailand 10 May 2016 Concluded
ECCHR et al vs. TÜV Rheinland AG Poor audit of Rana Plaza factory building structure and work 2 May 2016 Concluded
Survival International vs. Salini Impregilo Violation of indigenous people’s rights in Ethiopia & Kenya 14 March 2016 Concluded
Survival International vs. WWF Adverse impacts on indigenous people’s rights in Cameroon 10 February 2016 Withdrawn
ADHRB vs. Condor Non-Lethal Technologies HR violations in Bahrain enabled by tear gas supplier Condor 22 September 2015 Rejected
ADHRB vs. SAE Alsetex, Etienne Lacroix Group HR violations in Bahrain enabled by tear gas supplier Condor 19 August 2015 Agreement
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs ITOCHU HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia 29 July 2015 Pending
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs J-Power HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia 29 July 2015 Pending
Forum Suape et al. vs. Complexo Industrial e Portuário Eral Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil 1 June 2015 Rejected
Forum Suape et al. vs. Van Oord Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil 1 June 2015 Pending

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by