Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home / Case database / Human Rights Law Centre vs. Rio Tinto

Guideline: Commentary Ch. IV Paragraph 40

Description Enterprises can have an impact on virtually the entire spectrum of internationally recognised human rights. In practice, some human rights may be at greater risk than others in particular industries or contexts, and therefore will be the focus of heightened attention. However, situations may change, so all rights should be the subject of periodic review. Depending on circumstances, enterprises may need to consider additional standards. For instance, enterprises should respect the human rights of individuals belonging to specific groups or populations that require particular attention, where they may have adverse human rights impacts on them. In this connection, United Nations instruments have elaborated further on the rights of indigenous peoples; persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities; women; children; persons with disabilities; and migrant workers and their families. Moreover, in situations of armed conflict enterprises should respect the standards of international humanitarian law, which can help enterprises avoid the risks of causing or contributing to adverse impacts when operating in such difficult environments.

1 cases relating to 'Commentary Ch. IV Paragraph 40':

Title Issue Date filed Status
Human Rights Law Centre vs. Rio Tinto Rio Tinto former mine pollution impacts indigenous PNG commu 29 September 2020 Pending

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by