Guideline: Chapter IV Paragraph 6
Description | Enterprises should, within the framework of internationally recognised human rights, the international human rights obligations of the countries in which they operate as well as relevant domestic laws and regulations: Provide for or co-operate through legitimate processes in the remediation of adverse human rights impacts where they identify that they have caused or contributed to these impacts. |
---|
56 cases relating to 'Chapter IV Paragraph 6':
Title | Issue | Date filed | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Aminigboko Community vs. Daewoo Nigeria Ltd. | Daewoo Nigeria Ltd grabs land, hires outsiders for oil prjct | 22 December 2020 | Filed |
Human Rights Law Centre vs. Rio Tinto | Rio Tinto former mine pollution impacts indigenous PNG commu | 29 September 2020 | Pending |
Public Eye et al. vs. Syngenta | Syngenta pesticide poisons Indian agricultural workers | 17 September 2020 | Filed |
RAID et al. vs. Glencore UK | Providing products and services to Isreali prison system | 10 September 2020 | Filed |
Peruvian Indigenous Federations et al. vs. Pluspetrol | Pluspetrol's oil contamination in Peruvian Amzon | 11 March 2020 | Filed |
KTNC Watch et al vs. POSCO | POSCO's violations in palm plantation in Papua | 12 December 2019 | Pending |
Milieudefensie et al vs. ING | ING palm financing contributes to violations | 5 July 2019 | Pending |
South Korean Civil Society Team v. Korean Western Power | Dam collapse in Laos involving Kexim | 17 June 2019 | Pending |
IDI, EC, and LICADHO v. Bonsucro | Sugar industry MSI fails to address Cambodian land grabs | 11 March 2019 | Pending |
Former employee vs. Banro Corporation | Banro’s non-observance of Guidelines at the Twangiza Mine | 24 December 2018 | Rejected |
KTNC Watch et al vs Daewoo | Violations of FPIC, consultation at Philippine Jalaur dam | 15 October 2018 | Rejected |
KTNC Watch et al vs KEXIM | Violations of FPIC, consultation at Philippine Jalaur dam | 15 October 2018 | Rejected |
BIRD vs. HPG | HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain | 11 April 2018 | Pending |
BIRD vs. Jaguar Land Rover | HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain | 11 April 2018 | Rejected |
BIRD vs. Rolex | HPG's human rights impact in Bahrain | 11 April 2018 | Rejected |
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council vs Seabridge Gold | Seabridge Gold's Mining Exploration in Canada | 23 December 2016 | Rejected |
UK Lawyers for Israel vs. PwC | PWC audits of Palestinian Authority fail to reveal PA's supp | 15 December 2016 | Concluded |
Australian Women Without Borders vs. Mercer PR | Privacy violation of sexual assault victim | 27 October 2016 | Concluded |
Trade Unions vs. Suzuki Motor Corporation | Violations of trade union rights in Thailand | 10 May 2016 | Concluded |
Survival International vs. WWF | Adverse impacts on indigenous people’s rights in Cameroon | 10 February 2016 | Withdrawn |
ADHRB vs. SAE Alsetex, Etienne Lacroix Group | HR violations in Bahrain enabled by tear gas supplier Condor | 19 August 2015 | Agreement |
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs ITOCHU | HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia | 29 July 2015 | Pending |
Leaders of Paguyuban UKPWR vs J-Power | HR violations at ITOCHU & J-Power's power plant in Indonesia | 29 July 2015 | Pending |
Forum Suape et al. vs. Van Oord | Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil | 1 June 2015 | Pending |
Forum Suape et al. vs. Complexo Industrial e Portuário Eral | Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil | 1 June 2015 | Rejected |
Forum Suape et al. vs. Atradius Dutch State Business | Adverse impacts of Van Oord’s dredging operations in Brazil | 1 June 2015 | Concluded |
ELSAM et all. vs. Holcim Indonesia | Holcim’s complicity in HR abuses and conflict in Indonesia | 19 March 2015 | Concluded |
Reprieve vs. British Telecommunications plc | Facilitating US drone strikes in Yemen by BT Group | 10 October 2014 | Rejected |
EC and IDI vs. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group | ANZ’s role in displacing & dispossessing Cambodian families | 6 October 2014 | Agreement |
Human Rights Law Centre and Raid vs G4S | G4S’s contribution to human rights abuses of asylum seekers | 23 September 2014 | Rejected |