Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home / Case database / Advanced search / OECD Guidelines

Guideline: Chapter II Paragraph A13

Description Enterprises should in addition to addressing adverse impacts in relation to matters covered by the Guidelines, encourage, where practicable, business partners, including suppliers and sub-contractors, to apply principles of responsible business conduct compatible with the Guidelines.

29 cases relating to 'Chapter II Paragraph A13':

Title Issue Date filed Status
KNTC Watch et al vs. Samsung Heavy Industries et al Workers killed and injured in Korean shipyard crane accident 20 March 2019 Filed
Frank Bold vs. Grupa OLX sp. z o.o. Allowing advertising of products likely used contrary to law 9 April 2018 Agreement
Fivas et. al vs Bresser Human rights impacts from moving Turkey's Zeynel Bey Tomb 28 July 2017 Concluded
Society for Threatened Peoples vs. Credit Suisse Risks associated with North Dakota Access Pipeline in USA 24 April 2017 Pending
UK Lawyers for Israel vs. PwC PWC audits of Palestinian Authority fail to reveal PA's supp 15 December 2016 Pending
Bart Stapert vs. Mylan Mylan’s export of drugs used for death penalty in the US 3 March 2015 Agreement
EC and IDI vs. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group ANZ’s role in displacing & dispossessing Cambodian families 6 October 2014 Concluded
Fivas vs. Norconsult Norconsult’s lack of due diligence in Malaysia 22 August 2014 Agreement
WeCAN vs. Arrow International Damaged homes after 2010 and 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 17 June 2014 Pending
WeCAN vs. Vero Insurance New Zealand Limited Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Filed
WeCAN vs. IAG New Zealand Limited Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Pending
WeCAN vs. Tower Insurance Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Filed
WeCAN vs. Fletcher Construction Company Limited Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Pending
WeCAN vs. Southern Response Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Rejected
WeCAN vs. Earthquake Commission (EQC) Damaged homes after 2011 earthquakes in New-Zealand 11 November 2013 Rejected
Crude Accountability et al. vs. British Gas Environmental, health & HR violations by KPO in Kazakhstan 6 June 2013 Concluded
Crude Accountability et al. vs. ENI Environmental, health & HR violations by KPO in Kazakhstan 6 June 2013 Concluded
Crude Accountability et al. vs. Chevron Environmental, health & HR violations by KPO in Kazakhstan 6 June 2013 Concluded
Uwe Kekeritz et al vs. Karl Rieker German company's responsibility for Bangladesh factory fire 13 May 2013 Agreement
Uwe Kekeritz et al. vs. C&A German company's responsibility for Bangladesh factory fire 13 May 2013 Concluded
Uwe Kekeritz et al vs. KiK German company's responsibility for Bangladesh factory fire 13 May 2013 Concluded
Amadiba Crisis Committee vs. MRC Ltd. Human rights violations by mining agents. Amadiba, S. Africa 1 February 2013 Rejected
Privacy International et al. vs. Trovicor Gamma & Trovicor export surveillance technology to Bahrain 1 February 2013 Concluded
Privacy International et al. vs. Gamma International Gamma & Trovicor export surveillance technology to Bahrain 1 February 2013 Concluded
SEW and Stroitel vs. Barclays Shell & 3 UK banks link with violations Sakhalin II complex 31 July 2012 Rejected
SEW and Stroitel vs. Royal Bank of Scotland Shell & 3 UK banks link with violations Sakhalin II complex 31 July 2012 Rejected
SEW and Stroitel vs. Standard Chartered Bank Shell & 3 UK banks link with violations Sakhalin II complex 31 July 2012 Rejected
SEW and Stroitel vs. Shell Shell & 3 UK banks link with violations Sakhalin II complex 31 July 2012 Rejected
Siemenpuu et al vs Pöyry Group Pöyry Group's controversial advice on Xayaburi Dam in Laos 11 June 2012 Concluded

Personal tools

OECD Watch is hosted by